Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1507

reference
526-tree-1
name
1507
tree-preservation-order

undefined

526-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013820 50.898381)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013749 50.898374,-1.013753 50.898388,-1.013762 50.898400,-1.013778 50.898411,-1.013798 50.898417,-1.013819 50.898419,-1.013841 50.898417,-1.013861 50.898411,-1.013877 50.898401,-1.013888 50.898389,-1.013892 50.898375,-1.013888 50.898361,-1.013878 50.898349,-1.013863 50.898338,-1.013843 50.898332,-1.013821 50.898330,-1.013799 50.898332,-1.013779 50.898338,-1.013763 50.898348,-1.013753 50.898360,-1.013749 50.898374)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL