Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1507

reference
528-tree-1
name
1507
tree-preservation-order

undefined

528-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013898 50.898426)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013827 50.898418,-1.013831 50.898432,-1.013840 50.898445,-1.013856 50.898455,-1.013876 50.898461,-1.013897 50.898464,-1.013919 50.898462,-1.013939 50.898455,-1.013955 50.898446,-1.013966 50.898433,-1.013969 50.898419,-1.013966 50.898405,-1.013956 50.898393,-1.013941 50.898383,-1.013921 50.898376,-1.013899 50.898374,-1.013877 50.898376,-1.013857 50.898382,-1.013841 50.898392,-1.013831 50.898404,-1.013827 50.898418)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL