Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
532-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

532-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023768 50.883017)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023626 50.883002,-1.023632 50.883029,-1.023652 50.883055,-1.023683 50.883075,-1.023722 50.883088,-1.023766 50.883093,-1.023810 50.883089,-1.023850 50.883076,-1.023882 50.883057,-1.023903 50.883032,-1.023910 50.883004,-1.023904 50.882976,-1.023884 50.882951,-1.023853 50.882931,-1.023814 50.882918,-1.023770 50.882913,-1.023726 50.882917,-1.023686 50.882929,-1.023654 50.882949,-1.023633 50.882974,-1.023626 50.883002)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL