Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2008

reference
54-tree-1
name
2008
tree-preservation-order

undefined

54-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026827 50.867270)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026770 50.867264,-1.026772 50.867275,-1.026780 50.867285,-1.026793 50.867294,-1.026808 50.867299,-1.026826 50.867301,-1.026844 50.867299,-1.026860 50.867294,-1.026872 50.867286,-1.026881 50.867276,-1.026884 50.867265,-1.026881 50.867254,-1.026873 50.867244,-1.026861 50.867236,-1.026845 50.867231,-1.026827 50.867229,-1.026810 50.867230,-1.026794 50.867235,-1.026781 50.867243,-1.026773 50.867253,-1.026770 50.867264)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL