Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1291

reference
543-tree-1
name
1291
tree-preservation-order

undefined

543-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.014508 50.884033)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.014452 50.884027,-1.014454 50.884038,-1.014462 50.884048,-1.014475 50.884056,-1.014490 50.884061,-1.014508 50.884063,-1.014525 50.884061,-1.014541 50.884056,-1.014554 50.884049,-1.014562 50.884039,-1.014565 50.884028,-1.014563 50.884016,-1.014555 50.884006,-1.014543 50.883998,-1.014527 50.883993,-1.014509 50.883991,-1.014492 50.883993,-1.014476 50.883998,-1.014463 50.884006,-1.014455 50.884016,-1.014452 50.884027)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL