Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1067

reference
552-tree-1
name
1067
tree-preservation-order

undefined

552-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030441 50.881088)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030399 50.881083,-1.030401 50.881092,-1.030407 50.881099,-1.030416 50.881105,-1.030428 50.881109,-1.030441 50.881111,-1.030466 50.881106,-1.030476 50.881100,-1.030482 50.881092,-1.030484 50.881084,-1.030482 50.881076,-1.030476 50.881068,-1.030467 50.881062,-1.030455 50.881058,-1.030442 50.881057,-1.030429 50.881058,-1.030417 50.881062,-1.030407 50.881068,-1.030401 50.881075,-1.030399 50.881083)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL