Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0923

reference
553-tree-1
name
0923
tree-preservation-order

undefined

553-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.016153 50.894571)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.016054 50.894560,-1.016058 50.894580,-1.016072 50.894597,-1.016094 50.894611,-1.016121 50.894621,-1.016152 50.894624,-1.016183 50.894621,-1.016211 50.894612,-1.016233 50.894599,-1.016247 50.894581,-1.016253 50.894562,-1.016248 50.894542,-1.016235 50.894525,-1.016213 50.894511,-1.016185 50.894501,-1.016155 50.894498,-1.016124 50.894501,-1.016096 50.894510,-1.016074 50.894523,-1.016059 50.894541,-1.016054 50.894560)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL