Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
561-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

561-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.972553 50.866513)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.972524 50.866510,-0.972525 50.866515,-0.972529 50.866520,-0.972543 50.866527,-0.972552 50.866528,-0.972569 50.866525,-0.972580 50.866516,-0.972581 50.866510,-0.972580 50.866505,-0.972576 50.866500,-0.972570 50.866496,-0.972562 50.866493,-0.972553 50.866492,-0.972536 50.866495,-0.972530 50.866499,-0.972526 50.866504,-0.972524 50.866510)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL