Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
569-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

569-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.972853 50.866521)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.972782 50.866514,-0.972785 50.866528,-0.972795 50.866540,-0.972811 50.866550,-0.972830 50.866557,-0.972852 50.866559,-0.972874 50.866557,-0.972894 50.866551,-0.972910 50.866541,-0.972920 50.866529,-0.972924 50.866515,-0.972921 50.866501,-0.972911 50.866489,-0.972896 50.866478,-0.972876 50.866472,-0.972854 50.866470,-0.972832 50.866472,-0.972812 50.866478,-0.972796 50.866488,-0.972786 50.866500,-0.972782 50.866514)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL