Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
570-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

570-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.972986 50.866470)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.972915 50.866462,-0.972919 50.866476,-0.972928 50.866489,-0.972944 50.866499,-0.972963 50.866506,-0.972985 50.866508,-0.973007 50.866506,-0.973027 50.866500,-0.973043 50.866490,-0.973054 50.866478,-0.973057 50.866464,-0.973054 50.866450,-0.973044 50.866437,-0.973029 50.866427,-0.973009 50.866420,-0.972987 50.866418,-0.972965 50.866420,-0.972945 50.866426,-0.972929 50.866436,-0.972919 50.866449,-0.972915 50.866462)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL