Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1350

reference
591-tree-1
name
1350
tree-preservation-order

undefined

591-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.041884 50.865486)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.041842 50.865481,-1.041844 50.865490,-1.041850 50.865497,-1.041859 50.865503,-1.041871 50.865507,-1.041884 50.865509,-1.041897 50.865508,-1.041909 50.865504,-1.041919 50.865498,-1.041925 50.865490,-1.041927 50.865482,-1.041925 50.865474,-1.041919 50.865466,-1.041910 50.865460,-1.041898 50.865456,-1.041885 50.865455,-1.041872 50.865456,-1.041860 50.865460,-1.041850 50.865466,-1.041844 50.865473,-1.041842 50.865481)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL