Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1274

reference
592-tree-1
name
1274
tree-preservation-order

undefined

592-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046813 50.863437)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046742 50.863429,-1.046745 50.863443,-1.046755 50.863456,-1.046771 50.863466,-1.046790 50.863473,-1.046812 50.863475,-1.046834 50.863473,-1.046854 50.863467,-1.046870 50.863457,-1.046880 50.863444,-1.046884 50.863431,-1.046881 50.863417,-1.046871 50.863404,-1.046856 50.863394,-1.046836 50.863387,-1.046814 50.863385,-1.046792 50.863387,-1.046772 50.863393,-1.046756 50.863403,-1.046746 50.863416,-1.046742 50.863429)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL