Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1350

reference
593-tree-1
name
1350
tree-preservation-order

undefined

593-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.041953 50.865558)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.041897 50.865552,-1.041899 50.865563,-1.041907 50.865573,-1.041919 50.865581,-1.041935 50.865586,-1.041953 50.865588,-1.041970 50.865586,-1.041986 50.865581,-1.041999 50.865574,-1.042007 50.865564,-1.042010 50.865553,-1.042008 50.865541,-1.042000 50.865531,-1.041987 50.865523,-1.041972 50.865518,-1.041954 50.865516,-1.041937 50.865518,-1.041921 50.865523,-1.041908 50.865531,-1.041900 50.865541,-1.041897 50.865552)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL