Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1492

reference
595-tree-1
name
1492
tree-preservation-order

undefined

595-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.021757 50.881906)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.021643 50.881894,-1.021648 50.881916,-1.021664 50.881936,-1.021689 50.881952,-1.021720 50.881963,-1.021756 50.881967,-1.021791 50.881963,-1.021823 50.881953,-1.021848 50.881938,-1.021865 50.881918,-1.021871 50.881896,-1.021866 50.881873,-1.021850 50.881853,-1.021825 50.881837,-1.021794 50.881827,-1.021759 50.881823,-1.021723 50.881826,-1.021691 50.881836,-1.021666 50.881852,-1.021649 50.881872,-1.021643 50.881894)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL