Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1064

reference
601-tree-1
name
1064
tree-preservation-order

undefined

601-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.020134 50.879961)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.020021 50.879949,-1.020026 50.879971,-1.020042 50.879991,-1.020067 50.880008,-1.020098 50.880018,-1.020133 50.880022,-1.020168 50.880019,-1.020200 50.880009,-1.020226 50.879993,-1.020242 50.879973,-1.020248 50.879951,-1.020243 50.879929,-1.020228 50.879908,-1.020203 50.879892,-1.020171 50.879882,-1.020136 50.879878,-1.020101 50.879881,-1.020069 50.879891,-1.020044 50.879907,-1.020027 50.879927,-1.020021 50.879949)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL