Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1037

reference
605-tree-1
name
1037
tree-preservation-order

undefined

605-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023357 50.879958)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023314 50.879954,-1.023316 50.879962,-1.023322 50.879970,-1.023331 50.879976,-1.023343 50.879980,-1.023356 50.879981,-1.023370 50.879980,-1.023382 50.879976,-1.023391 50.879970,-1.023397 50.879963,-1.023400 50.879954,-1.023398 50.879946,-1.023392 50.879938,-1.023383 50.879932,-1.023371 50.879928,-1.023358 50.879927,-1.023344 50.879928,-1.023332 50.879932,-1.023323 50.879938,-1.023317 50.879945,-1.023314 50.879954)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL