Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1274

reference
606-tree-1
name
1274
tree-preservation-order

undefined

606-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046522 50.863269)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046493 50.863266,-1.046499 50.863276,-1.046505 50.863280,-1.046521 50.863284,-1.046530 50.863283,-1.046544 50.863277,-1.046549 50.863272,-1.046550 50.863266,-1.046549 50.863260,-1.046545 50.863255,-1.046539 50.863251,-1.046522 50.863248,-1.046505 50.863251,-1.046499 50.863255,-1.046495 50.863260,-1.046493 50.863266)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL