Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1101

reference
608-tree-1
name
1101
tree-preservation-order

undefined

608-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.019788 50.880197)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.019746 50.880193,-1.019748 50.880201,-1.019754 50.880209,-1.019763 50.880215,-1.019775 50.880219,-1.019788 50.880220,-1.019801 50.880219,-1.019813 50.880215,-1.019823 50.880209,-1.019829 50.880202,-1.019831 50.880193,-1.019829 50.880185,-1.019823 50.880177,-1.019814 50.880171,-1.019802 50.880167,-1.019789 50.880166,-1.019776 50.880167,-1.019764 50.880171,-1.019754 50.880177,-1.019748 50.880184,-1.019746 50.880193)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL