Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1101

reference
609-tree-1
name
1101
tree-preservation-order

undefined

609-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.019799 50.880241)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.019756 50.880236,-1.019758 50.880245,-1.019764 50.880252,-1.019773 50.880258,-1.019785 50.880262,-1.019798 50.880264,-1.019823 50.880259,-1.019833 50.880253,-1.019839 50.880245,-1.019841 50.880237,-1.019840 50.880229,-1.019834 50.880221,-1.019824 50.880215,-1.019813 50.880211,-1.019799 50.880210,-1.019786 50.880211,-1.019774 50.880215,-1.019765 50.880221,-1.019758 50.880228,-1.019756 50.880236)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL