Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1101

reference
610-tree-1
name
1101
tree-preservation-order

undefined

610-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.019150 50.880788)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.019107 50.880783,-1.019109 50.880792,-1.019115 50.880799,-1.019124 50.880805,-1.019136 50.880809,-1.019149 50.880811,-1.019162 50.880810,-1.019174 50.880806,-1.019184 50.880800,-1.019190 50.880793,-1.019192 50.880784,-1.019191 50.880776,-1.019185 50.880768,-1.019175 50.880762,-1.019164 50.880758,-1.019150 50.880757,-1.019137 50.880758,-1.019125 50.880762,-1.019116 50.880768,-1.019109 50.880775,-1.019107 50.880783)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL