Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
61-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

61-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.031027 50.867093)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030942 50.867083,-1.030946 50.867100,-1.030958 50.867115,-1.030976 50.867127,-1.031000 50.867135,-1.031026 50.867138,-1.031053 50.867136,-1.031077 50.867128,-1.031096 50.867116,-1.031108 50.867102,-1.031113 50.867085,-1.031109 50.867068,-1.031097 50.867053,-1.031078 50.867041,-1.031055 50.867033,-1.031029 50.867030,-1.031002 50.867033,-1.030978 50.867040,-1.030959 50.867052,-1.030947 50.867067,-1.030942 50.867083)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL