Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
622-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

622-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023269 50.881016)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023226 50.881012,-1.023228 50.881020,-1.023234 50.881028,-1.023243 50.881034,-1.023255 50.881038,-1.023268 50.881039,-1.023281 50.881038,-1.023293 50.881034,-1.023303 50.881028,-1.023309 50.881021,-1.023311 50.881013,-1.023309 50.881004,-1.023304 50.880997,-1.023294 50.880991,-1.023282 50.880987,-1.023269 50.880985,-1.023256 50.880986,-1.023244 50.880990,-1.023235 50.880996,-1.023228 50.881003,-1.023226 50.881012)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL