Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
626-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

626-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023171 50.880944)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023100 50.880937,-1.023103 50.880950,-1.023113 50.880963,-1.023128 50.880973,-1.023148 50.880980,-1.023170 50.880982,-1.023192 50.880980,-1.023212 50.880974,-1.023228 50.880964,-1.023238 50.880952,-1.023242 50.880938,-1.023239 50.880924,-1.023229 50.880911,-1.023213 50.880901,-1.023194 50.880895,-1.023172 50.880892,-1.023150 50.880894,-1.023130 50.880900,-1.023114 50.880910,-1.023104 50.880923,-1.023100 50.880937)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL