Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
638-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

638-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045997 50.866796)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045869 50.866783,-1.045875 50.866808,-1.045893 50.866831,-1.045921 50.866849,-1.045956 50.866861,-1.045996 50.866865,-1.046035 50.866861,-1.046071 50.866850,-1.046100 50.866832,-1.046118 50.866810,-1.046125 50.866785,-1.046119 50.866760,-1.046102 50.866737,-1.046074 50.866719,-1.046038 50.866707,-1.045999 50.866703,-1.045959 50.866707,-1.045924 50.866718,-1.045895 50.866736,-1.045876 50.866758,-1.045869 50.866783)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL