Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
640-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

640-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046152 50.866680)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046081 50.866672,-1.046085 50.866686,-1.046094 50.866699,-1.046110 50.866709,-1.046130 50.866715,-1.046151 50.866718,-1.046173 50.866716,-1.046193 50.866709,-1.046209 50.866700,-1.046220 50.866687,-1.046223 50.866673,-1.046220 50.866659,-1.046210 50.866647,-1.046195 50.866637,-1.046175 50.866630,-1.046153 50.866628,-1.046131 50.866630,-1.046111 50.866636,-1.046095 50.866646,-1.046085 50.866658,-1.046081 50.866672)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL