Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1216

reference
641-tree-1
name
1216
tree-preservation-order

undefined

641-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012081 50.866838)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012025 50.866832,-1.012027 50.866843,-1.012035 50.866854,-1.012047 50.866862,-1.012063 50.866867,-1.012081 50.866869,-1.012098 50.866867,-1.012114 50.866862,-1.012127 50.866854,-1.012135 50.866844,-1.012138 50.866833,-1.012136 50.866822,-1.012128 50.866812,-1.012116 50.866804,-1.012100 50.866799,-1.012082 50.866797,-1.012065 50.866798,-1.012049 50.866803,-1.012036 50.866811,-1.012028 50.866821,-1.012025 50.866832)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL