Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
643-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

643-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046062 50.866603)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045991 50.866595,-1.045994 50.866609,-1.046004 50.866622,-1.046020 50.866632,-1.046039 50.866638,-1.046061 50.866641,-1.046083 50.866639,-1.046103 50.866632,-1.046119 50.866622,-1.046130 50.866610,-1.046133 50.866596,-1.046130 50.866582,-1.046120 50.866570,-1.046105 50.866560,-1.046085 50.866553,-1.046063 50.866551,-1.046041 50.866553,-1.046021 50.866559,-1.046005 50.866569,-1.045995 50.866581,-1.045991 50.866595)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL