Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
645-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

645-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046722 50.865976)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046636 50.865967,-1.046640 50.865983,-1.046652 50.865999,-1.046671 50.866011,-1.046694 50.866019,-1.046721 50.866021,-1.046747 50.866019,-1.046771 50.866012,-1.046790 50.866000,-1.046802 50.865985,-1.046807 50.865968,-1.046803 50.865951,-1.046791 50.865936,-1.046773 50.865924,-1.046749 50.865916,-1.046723 50.865914,-1.046696 50.865916,-1.046672 50.865923,-1.046653 50.865935,-1.046641 50.865950,-1.046636 50.865967)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL