Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
662-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

662-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013534 50.867481)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013491 50.867476,-1.013493 50.867485,-1.013499 50.867492,-1.013508 50.867498,-1.013520 50.867502,-1.013533 50.867504,-1.013546 50.867503,-1.013558 50.867499,-1.013568 50.867493,-1.013574 50.867485,-1.013576 50.867477,-1.013574 50.867469,-1.013569 50.867461,-1.013559 50.867455,-1.013547 50.867451,-1.013534 50.867450,-1.013521 50.867451,-1.013509 50.867455,-1.013500 50.867461,-1.013493 50.867468,-1.013491 50.867476)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL