Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1051

reference
688-tree-1
name
1051
tree-preservation-order

undefined

688-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017941 50.881916)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017870 50.881908,-1.017874 50.881922,-1.017883 50.881935,-1.017899 50.881945,-1.017919 50.881951,-1.017940 50.881954,-1.017962 50.881952,-1.017982 50.881945,-1.017998 50.881935,-1.018009 50.881923,-1.018012 50.881909,-1.018009 50.881895,-1.017999 50.881883,-1.017984 50.881873,-1.017964 50.881866,-1.017942 50.881864,-1.017920 50.881866,-1.017900 50.881872,-1.017884 50.881882,-1.017874 50.881894,-1.017870 50.881908)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL