Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
702-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

702-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013274 50.867492)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013232 50.867487,-1.013233 50.867496,-1.013239 50.867503,-1.013249 50.867509,-1.013260 50.867513,-1.013274 50.867515,-1.013299 50.867510,-1.013308 50.867504,-1.013315 50.867496,-1.013317 50.867488,-1.013315 50.867480,-1.013309 50.867472,-1.013300 50.867466,-1.013288 50.867462,-1.013275 50.867461,-1.013262 50.867462,-1.013240 50.867471,-1.013234 50.867479,-1.013232 50.867487)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL