Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
705-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

705-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012266 50.866833)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012224 50.866828,-1.012226 50.866836,-1.012231 50.866844,-1.012241 50.866850,-1.012253 50.866854,-1.012266 50.866855,-1.012279 50.866854,-1.012291 50.866851,-1.012300 50.866845,-1.012307 50.866837,-1.012309 50.866829,-1.012307 50.866821,-1.012301 50.866813,-1.012292 50.866807,-1.012280 50.866803,-1.012267 50.866802,-1.012254 50.866803,-1.012242 50.866806,-1.012232 50.866812,-1.012226 50.866820,-1.012224 50.866828)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL