Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
709-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

709-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012610 50.866665)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012568 50.866660,-1.012569 50.866669,-1.012575 50.866676,-1.012585 50.866682,-1.012596 50.866686,-1.012610 50.866688,-1.012635 50.866683,-1.012644 50.866677,-1.012651 50.866669,-1.012653 50.866661,-1.012651 50.866653,-1.012645 50.866645,-1.012636 50.866639,-1.012624 50.866635,-1.012611 50.866634,-1.012598 50.866635,-1.012576 50.866644,-1.012570 50.866652,-1.012568 50.866660)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL