Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
711-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

711-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971463 50.866714)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971406 50.866708,-0.971409 50.866719,-0.971417 50.866729,-0.971429 50.866737,-0.971445 50.866742,-0.971463 50.866744,-0.971480 50.866743,-0.971496 50.866738,-0.971509 50.866730,-0.971517 50.866720,-0.971520 50.866709,-0.971518 50.866698,-0.971510 50.866687,-0.971497 50.866679,-0.971482 50.866674,-0.971464 50.866672,-0.971446 50.866674,-0.971431 50.866679,-0.971418 50.866687,-0.971409 50.866697,-0.971406 50.866708)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL