Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
712-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

712-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971344 50.866626)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971273 50.866618,-0.971277 50.866632,-0.971286 50.866645,-0.971302 50.866655,-0.971322 50.866662,-0.971343 50.866664,-0.971365 50.866662,-0.971385 50.866656,-0.971401 50.866646,-0.971412 50.866633,-0.971416 50.866620,-0.971412 50.866606,-0.971403 50.866593,-0.971387 50.866583,-0.971367 50.866576,-0.971345 50.866574,-0.971323 50.866576,-0.971304 50.866582,-0.971288 50.866592,-0.971277 50.866604,-0.971273 50.866618)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL