Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1224

reference
743-tree-1
name
1224
tree-preservation-order

undefined

743-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007116 50.885382)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007059 50.885376,-1.007062 50.885387,-1.007070 50.885397,-1.007082 50.885405,-1.007098 50.885410,-1.007115 50.885412,-1.007133 50.885411,-1.007149 50.885406,-1.007162 50.885398,-1.007170 50.885388,-1.007173 50.885377,-1.007170 50.885366,-1.007163 50.885356,-1.007150 50.885348,-1.007134 50.885342,-1.007117 50.885340,-1.007099 50.885342,-1.007083 50.885347,-1.007071 50.885355,-1.007062 50.885365,-1.007059 50.885376)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL