Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1224

reference
747-tree-1
name
1224
tree-preservation-order

undefined

747-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007276 50.884309)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007191 50.884300,-1.007195 50.884317,-1.007206 50.884332,-1.007225 50.884344,-1.007249 50.884352,-1.007275 50.884355,-1.007301 50.884352,-1.007325 50.884345,-1.007344 50.884333,-1.007357 50.884318,-1.007361 50.884302,-1.007358 50.884285,-1.007346 50.884270,-1.007327 50.884258,-1.007304 50.884250,-1.007277 50.884247,-1.007251 50.884249,-1.007227 50.884257,-1.007208 50.884269,-1.007195 50.884283,-1.007191 50.884300)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL