Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1224

reference
749-tree-1
name
1224
tree-preservation-order

undefined

749-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009264 50.883562)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009235 50.883559,-1.009236 50.883564,-1.009240 50.883570,-1.009247 50.883574,-1.009263 50.883577,-1.009280 50.883574,-1.009291 50.883565,-1.009292 50.883559,-1.009291 50.883554,-1.009287 50.883549,-1.009281 50.883545,-1.009273 50.883542,-1.009264 50.883541,-1.009247 50.883544,-1.009241 50.883548,-1.009237 50.883553,-1.009235 50.883559)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL