Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1146

reference
750-tree-1
name
1146
tree-preservation-order

undefined

750-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013398 50.881833)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013369 50.881830,-1.013371 50.881836,-1.013375 50.881841,-1.013381 50.881845,-1.013397 50.881848,-1.013414 50.881845,-1.013421 50.881841,-1.013425 50.881836,-1.013426 50.881830,-1.013425 50.881825,-1.013421 50.881820,-1.013415 50.881816,-1.013407 50.881813,-1.013398 50.881812,-1.013389 50.881813,-1.013375 50.881819,-1.013371 50.881824,-1.013369 50.881830)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL