Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1102

reference
759-tree-1
name
1102
tree-preservation-order

undefined

759-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.011744 50.887216)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.011687 50.887210,-1.011689 50.887221,-1.011697 50.887231,-1.011710 50.887239,-1.011725 50.887244,-1.011743 50.887246,-1.011761 50.887244,-1.011777 50.887239,-1.011789 50.887232,-1.011798 50.887222,-1.011801 50.887211,-1.011798 50.887199,-1.011790 50.887189,-1.011778 50.887181,-1.011762 50.887176,-1.011745 50.887174,-1.011727 50.887176,-1.011711 50.887181,-1.011698 50.887189,-1.011690 50.887198,-1.011687 50.887210)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL