Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
77-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

77-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029984 50.867012)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029941 50.867007,-1.029943 50.867016,-1.029949 50.867023,-1.029958 50.867029,-1.029970 50.867033,-1.029983 50.867035,-1.030008 50.867030,-1.030018 50.867024,-1.030024 50.867016,-1.030026 50.867008,-1.030025 50.867000,-1.030019 50.866992,-1.030009 50.866986,-1.029998 50.866982,-1.029984 50.866981,-1.029971 50.866982,-1.029959 50.866986,-1.029950 50.866991,-1.029944 50.866999,-1.029941 50.867007)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL