Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1056

reference
778-tree-1
name
1056
tree-preservation-order

undefined

778-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035324 50.862826)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035239 50.862817,-1.035243 50.862833,-1.035254 50.862848,-1.035273 50.862860,-1.035297 50.862868,-1.035323 50.862871,-1.035349 50.862869,-1.035373 50.862861,-1.035392 50.862849,-1.035405 50.862835,-1.035409 50.862818,-1.035405 50.862801,-1.035394 50.862786,-1.035375 50.862774,-1.035351 50.862766,-1.035325 50.862763,-1.035299 50.862766,-1.035275 50.862773,-1.035256 50.862785,-1.035243 50.862800,-1.035239 50.862817)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL