Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1056

reference
784-tree-1
name
1056
tree-preservation-order

undefined

784-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035325 50.862710)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035254 50.862702,-1.035257 50.862716,-1.035267 50.862729,-1.035282 50.862739,-1.035302 50.862745,-1.035324 50.862748,-1.035346 50.862745,-1.035366 50.862739,-1.035382 50.862729,-1.035392 50.862717,-1.035396 50.862703,-1.035393 50.862689,-1.035383 50.862677,-1.035367 50.862667,-1.035348 50.862660,-1.035326 50.862658,-1.035304 50.862660,-1.035284 50.862666,-1.035268 50.862676,-1.035258 50.862688,-1.035254 50.862702)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL