Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1056

reference
785-tree-1
name
1056
tree-preservation-order

undefined

785-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035282 50.862701)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035211 50.862693,-1.035215 50.862707,-1.035224 50.862720,-1.035240 50.862730,-1.035260 50.862736,-1.035282 50.862739,-1.035304 50.862737,-1.035323 50.862730,-1.035339 50.862721,-1.035350 50.862708,-1.035354 50.862694,-1.035350 50.862680,-1.035340 50.862668,-1.035325 50.862658,-1.035305 50.862651,-1.035283 50.862649,-1.035261 50.862651,-1.035241 50.862657,-1.035226 50.862667,-1.035215 50.862679,-1.035211 50.862693)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL