Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0892

reference
789-tree-1
name
0892
tree-preservation-order

undefined

789-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035381 50.862658)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035254 50.862644,-1.035259 50.862669,-1.035277 50.862692,-1.035305 50.862710,-1.035340 50.862722,-1.035380 50.862726,-1.035419 50.862723,-1.035455 50.862712,-1.035484 50.862694,-1.035503 50.862671,-1.035509 50.862647,-1.035504 50.862621,-1.035486 50.862599,-1.035458 50.862581,-1.035423 50.862569,-1.035383 50.862565,-1.035344 50.862568,-1.035308 50.862579,-1.035279 50.862597,-1.035260 50.862619,-1.035254 50.862644)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL