Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2040

reference
80-tree-1
name
2040
tree-preservation-order

undefined

80-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005736 50.861377)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005680 50.861371,-1.005682 50.861382,-1.005690 50.861392,-1.005702 50.861400,-1.005718 50.861405,-1.005736 50.861407,-1.005753 50.861405,-1.005769 50.861400,-1.005782 50.861393,-1.005790 50.861383,-1.005793 50.861372,-1.005791 50.861360,-1.005783 50.861350,-1.005770 50.861342,-1.005755 50.861337,-1.005737 50.861335,-1.005720 50.861337,-1.005704 50.861342,-1.005691 50.861350,-1.005683 50.861359,-1.005680 50.861371)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL