Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1386

reference
798-tree-1
name
1386
tree-preservation-order

undefined

798-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.043645 50.857653)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.043603 50.857648,-1.043605 50.857657,-1.043611 50.857664,-1.043620 50.857670,-1.043632 50.857674,-1.043645 50.857676,-1.043658 50.857675,-1.043670 50.857671,-1.043680 50.857665,-1.043686 50.857657,-1.043688 50.857649,-1.043686 50.857641,-1.043680 50.857633,-1.043671 50.857627,-1.043659 50.857623,-1.043646 50.857622,-1.043633 50.857623,-1.043621 50.857627,-1.043611 50.857633,-1.043605 50.857640,-1.043603 50.857648)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL