Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1386

reference
799-tree-1
name
1386
tree-preservation-order

undefined

799-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.043554 50.857625)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.043511 50.857620,-1.043513 50.857629,-1.043519 50.857636,-1.043528 50.857642,-1.043540 50.857646,-1.043553 50.857648,-1.043578 50.857643,-1.043588 50.857637,-1.043594 50.857629,-1.043596 50.857621,-1.043594 50.857613,-1.043589 50.857605,-1.043579 50.857599,-1.043567 50.857595,-1.043554 50.857594,-1.043541 50.857595,-1.043529 50.857599,-1.043520 50.857604,-1.043513 50.857612,-1.043511 50.857620)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL