Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1386

reference
800-tree-1
name
1386
tree-preservation-order

undefined

800-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.043677 50.857619)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.043634 50.857615,-1.043636 50.857623,-1.043642 50.857631,-1.043651 50.857637,-1.043663 50.857641,-1.043676 50.857642,-1.043689 50.857641,-1.043701 50.857637,-1.043711 50.857631,-1.043717 50.857624,-1.043719 50.857616,-1.043717 50.857607,-1.043712 50.857600,-1.043702 50.857594,-1.043690 50.857590,-1.043677 50.857588,-1.043652 50.857593,-1.043643 50.857599,-1.043636 50.857607,-1.043634 50.857615)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL