Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2030

reference
8-tree-1
name
2030
tree-preservation-order

undefined

8-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013267 50.854603)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013210 50.854597,-1.013213 50.854608,-1.013221 50.854618,-1.013233 50.854626,-1.013249 50.854632,-1.013266 50.854633,-1.013284 50.854632,-1.013300 50.854627,-1.013312 50.854619,-1.013321 50.854609,-1.013324 50.854598,-1.013321 50.854587,-1.013313 50.854577,-1.013301 50.854569,-1.013285 50.854563,-1.013268 50.854562,-1.013250 50.854563,-1.013234 50.854568,-1.013221 50.854576,-1.013213 50.854586,-1.013210 50.854597)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL